Sebastian Sorger vs Johan Nikles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Jul at 12:38 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Sorger vs J. Nikles

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sorger 1 - 0 Nikles
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sebastian Sorger winning 2 and Johan Nikles winning 1. The last match between Sebastian Sorger and Johan Nikles was at the M25 Ollersbach, 24-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Sebastian Sorger getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sorger | 1 |
| Nikles | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Ollersbach(07-24-25)
S. Sorger vs J. Nikles H2H Profile
S. Sorger vs J. Nikles Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Nikles has had a slight edge, winning 44.1% of points on their second serve compared to Sorger's 42.83%.
- Return Game Stats: Sorger shows a better return on their opponent's second serve with 49.13%, while Nikles stands at 48.35%. For first serve returns, Sorger again leads with 34.5% over Nikles' 32.69%.
- Pressure Handling: Can Nikles save breakpoints more effectively under pressure? Indeed, they have, with a 50.94% save rate compared to Sorger's 48.34%.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Sorger has a superior match win rate at 63.64% versus Nikles' 60%.
- Best Surface: Both players perform best on Hard courts with a win rate of 62%.
- Player Level: Sorger has a slight advantage at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, winning 66% of their matches compared to Nikles' 61.54%.
- Opponent Quality: Nikles has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent ranking of 322.78, contrary to Sorger’s 395.56.
- Deciding Set Performance: Nikles outperforms in deciding sets with a 56% win rate, whereas Sorger holds a 37% win rate.
- Break Point Conversion: Sorger has converted 44.97% of break point opportunities, edging out Nikles at 42.22%.
- Which player is more likely to win? Evaluating the stats, match insights suggest a close contest.
Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):
Nikles and Sorger's head-to-head stats unfold a balanced battle. Their recent second serve success rate indicates a negligible difference, with a slight favor towards Nikles.
When scrutinizing return games, Sorger takes the lead, particularly in converting first and second serve returns. However, when playing under pressure, Nikles shows proficiency in breakpoint saves, an indicator of their tenacity.
Looking at performance over the last year, Sorger displays a marginally better overall win rate. Their advantage on hard courts is mutual, suggesting similar adaptability on their preferred surface.
Evaluating opponent levels and deciding set performances provides Nikles an edge, having faced stronger competition and clutch performances in critical match moments.
Despite Sorger’s effective break point conversions, the broader statistics point towards Nikles, especially in decisive scenarios. Taking all aspects into account, Nikles seems slightly favored to seize victory in this match-up.
Sebastian Sorger vs Johan Nikles Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Sorger vs J. Nikles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:57:12 | Average Match Time | 1:57:12 |
| 73% (58/80) | 1st Serve % | 55% (41/74) |
| 64% (37/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 32% (7/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 50% (37/74) | Return Points Win % | 45% (36/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Sorger Recent Matches Played
J. Nikles Recent Matches Played

S. Sorger vs J. Nikles Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.14% (152/105) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.58% (321/227) |
| 57.62% (344/253) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.90% (713/540) |
| 53.53% (2972/2580) | Games Win/Loss | 52.97% (6100/5416) |
| 61.97% (44/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.75% (96/57) |
| 58.06% (108/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.29% (217/149) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27.59% (8/21) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 192 | Aces Total | 347 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 428 | Total Double Faults | 1159 |
| 1:30:22 | Average Match Time | 1:24:4 |
| 421.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 506.67 |
| 72% (10617/14658) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20732/31370) |
| 62% (6557/10617) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (12604/20732) |
| 50% (2029/4041) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5080/10638) |
| 47% (852/1818) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1814/3929) |
| 45% (6874/15429) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14330/31740) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Challenger W/L | 49.41% (42/43) |
| 60.91% (148/95) | Futures W/L | 60.98% (275/176) |
| 58% (146/251) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (317/540) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (21/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (65/118) |
| 47% (41/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (89/163) |
| 85% (152/129) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (306/266) |
| 15% (152/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (306/39) |
| 20% (105/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (242/55) |